Posted by Dave as College Football, Rutgers Scarlet Knights, USF Bulls at 6:26 PM EDT on October 18th, 2007

If five years ago you were to tell me that the BCS would be absolutely crazy, and that a game between Rutgers and South Florida may be decide who plays for a national title, I would’ve asked: In five years, do three teams play at the same time?
And I must say, I’m truly ready for the BCS to get completely insane, and tonight could help that. If USF loses, there’s obvious reason for panic: An ACC team — and I’m a Georgia Tech fan, so don’t think I’m being biased; the ACC just stinks — could very well be playing for the national title, and their name isn’t Virginia Tech, Florida State or Miami.
If USF wins, there’s an outside shot that they could go undefeated and eventually be passed by a team with one loss. Which would make for one of those This-BCS-System-Is-So-Screwed-Up-Switch-To-A-Playoff-Already kind of reactions (as if we don’t have enough of that).
So, the madness begins in about thirty minutes. There’s a part of me that feels Rutgers will make an upset, and the other part of me says ESPN’s talking about USF so much and all the pros they have that I gotta go with this team (funny thing is, ESPN didn’t know any of these guys’ names two months ago, and now they’re CERTAIN first round locks).
Enjoy the game.
I know I will.
Posted by Dave as Alabama Crimson Tide, Boston College, Cincinnati Bearcats, College Football, Connecticut Huskies, Louisville Cardinals, Rutgers Scarlet Knights, South Carolina Gamecocks, Tennessee Volunteers, USF Bulls, Vanderbilt, Win Some Money: College Football Spreads at 6:46 PM EDT on October 17th, 2007
Here’s how I’m doing:
Last week: 2-2
On the season: Still got a ways to go
What I would’ve been had BC just scored two more points: 3-1
This week’s locks:
-South Florida @ Rutgers (+2): Based on how this season has gone thus far, Rutgers upsetting and someone else being thrust into the BCS Title game picture would only be fitting. Next up: Boston College. Rutgers win in an upset.
-Louisville (-3) @ Connecticut: I don’t have to look at who Connecticut has played to know their record is a bit inflated. I said last week Louisville as a ten point underdog was ridiculous. This week is no different. A three point favorite? Not with that offense. Connecticut is still a basketball school. And to be honest, I’d take Louisville there, too. Brian and the Boys cover the three, win by two touchdowns.
-Vanderbilt @ South Carolina (-13): I’m a real sucker for a team that’s ranked in the top ten and is favored by less than two touchdowns against a team that. . . well, stinks. They played Georgia close, sure; but Georgia hasn’t exactly been a beacon of brilliance the last few weeks. Take SC in a blowout.
-Tennessee (PICK) @ Alabama: I’m a Vols fan. They’ve got an offense. I know it’s a rivalry game, I know it’s in Tuscaloosa. All that said, the Tide sucks. UT rolls.
Posted by Dave as Cincinnati Bearcats, College Football, College Football's Upon Us, Connecticut Huskies, Louisville Cardinals, Pittsburgh Panthers, Rutgers Scarlet Knights, Syracuse Orange, USF Bulls, West Virginia Mountaineers at 7:52 PM EDT on August 20th, 2007

A lot of blogs are doing this, so I feel I should jump in. And with the recent nothingness in sports, why not? Which brings me to this: Each day I will try and post major conference breakdowns for all you college fanatics out there. The Big Twelve, SEC and ACC will be broken into two parts, since there’s two different divisions. All others will be covered in whole.
I’ll have a ranking posted next to each team, and for the teams in conferences broken down by divisions, that ranking doesn’t represent the ranking for the division. . . it represents the ranking for the entire conference. To see past entries, click here. On we go.